Legal Opinion

Kienzle v. General Motors, LLC

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided October 29, 2012No. Case No. 11-11930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff Patricia Kienzle alleges in a complaint filed in this Court that from July 2009 to January 2010, defendant General Motors LLC (GM) paid Kienzle less money for doing the same work as male supervisors and the male engineers that she managed. In an amended complaint, she also alleges that male supervisors she worked with harassed her, that managers and company human resources…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reeder v. County of WayneDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
  2. Boaz v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2015
  3. Blair v. America's Home Place, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API