Legal Opinion

Boaz v. Federal Express Corp.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided May 22, 2015No. 2:09-cv-2232-dkvPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

DIANE K. VESCOVO, United States Magistrate Judge.

In this employment discrimination lawsuit, the plaintiff, Margaret Boaz (“Boaz”), claims that the defendants, Federal Express Corporation d/b/a FedEx Express and FedEx Customer Information Services, Inc. (collectively “FedEx”), violated two provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”): (1) the “Minimum Wage” provision, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d) — also known as the Equal Pay Amendment of the FLSA — -which prohibits wage discrimination between employees on the basis of sex, (“EPA Wage Discrimination Claim”);…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. County of Washington v. GuntherSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Cora Aldrich v. Randolph Central School District and Cattaraugus County Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  4. Carol A. Timmer v. Michigan Department of Commerce and Michigan Department of Civil Service, United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. Lynda Fallon v. State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rogers v. Bridges Rehabilitation Services LLC.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API