Thom v. Liard
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.
This is a suit for the partition of the following described real property, to-wit:
“Lot Two (2), Block Seven (7), Inglenook Addition to the City of Seaside, Clatsop County, Oregon.”
The defendant The First Seaside Bank has not appealed and, therefore, when we speak of the “defendant” in this opinion we are referring to Elizabeth U. Liard.
Prior to September 26, 1952, Azellus Liard and the defendant Elizabeth U. Liard were husband and wife, and were the owners of estates by the entirety in Lots 2 and 3, Block 7, of the above described addition to the city of Seaside. A divorce was granted to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Siebert v. SiebertOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- Esselstyn v. CASTEELOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Kellogg v. KelloggOregon Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of NolanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Costley v. CostleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986