Legal Opinion
Rhodes v. Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co.
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided December 19, 1904PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Exceptions from Circuit Court, First Circuit.
1Opinion of the Court
*320OPINION OF THE COURT BY
HATCH, J.
This was an action by Mary S. Rhodes, a married woman, against the Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Company, defendant, for damages for injuries done to plaintiff by the servants of the defendant corporation in ejecting plaintiff from a car of’ the defendant. The case was tried before a jury on the 2d day of May, 1904. A verdict was found for the plaintiff with damages in the sum of $500. The bill of exceptions sets out thirty-one exceptions taken by the defendant during the trial and duly allowed. The defendant summarizes the exceptions under four-heads as…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Winter's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Sloane v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Hamilton v. . Third Avenue Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Head v. Georgia Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Townsend v. . N.Y. Cen. H. River R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jeffs v. Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1905