Legal Opinion
Fraenza v. Keeney
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided February 11, 1994No. File 516748PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaloney, J.
The plaintiff appeals the decision of the named defendant, the commissioner of environmental protection (commissioner), denying the plaintiff’s application for a tidal wetlands permit pursuant to General Statutes § 22a-32 and a structures and dredging permit pursuant to General Statutes § 22a-361. The plaintiff appeals under General Statutes § 4-183. The court finds the issues in favor of the commissioner.
The following essential facts are undisputed. In December, 1986, the plaintiff filed an application with the defendant department of environmental protection (department) seeking permits…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Connecticut Building Wrecking Co. v. CarothersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Lieberman v. State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Starr v. Commissioner of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dadiskos v. Connecticut Real Estate CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Fraenza v. KeeneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Town of Fairfield v. Connecticut Siting CouncilConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Cohen v. Commissioner, No. Cv 01 0508149s (Sep. 24, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
- Emond v. Durfee, 91-0237 (1996)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.