Legal Opinion

United States v. Grover

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 27, 1915No. 15,214PublishedCited by 10 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the United States against "Harry M. Grover and William Barklage. On exceptions to master’s report. Exceptions sustained.

1Opinion of the Court

VAN FLEET, District Judge.

This is a bill by the government te cancel the patent to a parcel of public land. The defendant William Barklage held a mortgage on the premises, executed by Grover, the patentee, after receipt of final certificate, but before patent, and he filed an answer in which- he set up his rights under his mortgage, claiming as an innocent purchaser. He died pending tlie suit and before trial; but the government by bill of revivor brought in those succeeding to his rights, and made them defendants. After the appointment of Barklage’s executors, the latter, who were his…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. London & San Francisco Bank v. BandmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. United States v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Dillon v. ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Sloan v. RiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pacific National Agricultural Credit Corp. v. WilburCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Commerce Savings Lincoln, Inc. v. RobinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Mutual Reserve Association v. ZeranWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. County Trust Co. v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  5. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. WillingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API