Legal Opinion

Hoeft v. Raddatz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 18, 1927No. 25,778PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

This is an appeal from an order denying an alternative motion for judgment or a new trial after a verdict in respondent’s favor for $2,398.

The complaint pleaded two causes of action, the first for damages sustained by reason of alleged false and fraudulent representations made by appellant, which induced the respondent to convey to him 20 acres of land in the village of Pine Island and to accept therefor $1,600 in money and a conveyance of 60 acres of land near the village of Oronoco. The 20-acre tract was subject to a mortgage of $1,700 and to some unpaid special assessments, and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Adan v. SteinbrecherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  2. Follingstad v. SyversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jasmer v. EngelmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Jasmer v. EngelmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API