Legal Opinion
Matter of Hoover
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided October 4, 1989No. SB-88-0029-DPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.
This case comes before us for final disposition following a previous hearing and remand to the Disciplinary Commission. See In re Hoover, 155 Ariz. 192, 745 P.2d 939 (1987) {Hoover I). Our jurisdiction over bar discipline is based on provisions of the Arizona Constitution, inherent authority, and procedural rules.1
FACTS
Hoover I sets forth the facts in detail. Respondent, a respected and successful attorney, suffers from bipolar manic depressive psychosis, which presently is in remission. While under pressure and work*531ing on a large real estate transaction,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- In re DayIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
- In Re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, PappasArizona Supreme Court · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Matter of RivkindArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Matter of LevineArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, LoftusArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re the Discipline of EnnengaUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- Bertleson v. Sacks Tierney, P.A.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.