State v. Perrin
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Defendant appeals from his conviction of felon in possession of a restricted weapon and attacks the constitutionality of ORS 166.270(2). Among other things, the statute prohibits a person who has been convicted of a felony from possessing “an instrument or weapon commonly known as a blackjack.” Defendant makes multiple assignments of error, one of which is dispositive. We reverse.
Defendant has previously been convicted of the crimes of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree. On July 14, 1995, the motor vehicle driven by defendant was stopped for having a burned out…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. KesslerOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. GravesOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. DelgadoOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. CornellOregon Supreme Court · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. CourtierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000