Legal Opinion

Peabody v. P.J.'s Auto Village, Inc.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 27, 1989No. 87-526PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment, following a bench trial, in favor of defendant, P.J.’s Auto Village, Inc. She lost her suit for damages under Vermont’s Consumer Fraud Act, 9 V.S.A. § 2453(a), resulting from P.J.’s sale to her of the front of a 1974 Saab welded to the back of a 1972 Saab, known-in the trade as a “clipped” vehicle. The only issue is whether the trial court erred when it required plaintiff to prove actual damage. We reverse and remand.

I

On February 20, 1979, P.J.’s sold plaintiff a used Saab for $2,895.00. Before P.J.’s received the Saab as a trade-in, someone created it by welding…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Charles of the Ritz Distributors Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  2. Bernard v. Central Carolina Truck Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Sterling Drug, Inc., Dancer-Fitzgerald-Sample, Inc., and Thompson-Koch CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  4. Poulin v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1986

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Winey v. William E. Dailey, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  2. Citaramanis v. HallowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Carter v. GugliuzziSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  4. Bisson v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  5. Greene v. Stevens Gas ServiceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API