Legal Opinion

Misenheimer v. Burris

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 17, 2006No. 245A05PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Justice.

The question presented is an issue of first impression: Whether, in an action for criminal conversation, the applicable statute of limitations is tolled until discovery of the extramarital- affair by the aggrieved party. Because we hold that the discovery rule of N.C.G.S. § 1-52(16) applies to actions for criminal conversation, we reverse the Court of Appeals.

*621FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Donald Eugene Misc.heimer ■ (plaintiff) and his wife, Rebecca Misc.heimer (Mrs. Misc.heimer) were married in February 1971. Plaintiff met James Clayton Burris (defendant) in the 1970s. Defendant…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Black v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Diaz v. Division of Social ServicesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Kent Stahle v. CTS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  2. Birtha v. Stonemor, North Carolina, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. In re Camp Lejeune North Carolina Water Contamination LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016
  4. McClean v. Duke Univ.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2019
  5. Perry v. Pamlico CountyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API