Misenheimer v. Burris
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRADY, Justice.
The question presented is an issue of first impression: Whether, in an action for criminal conversation, the applicable statute of limitations is tolled until discovery of the extramarital- affair by the aggrieved party. Because we hold that the discovery rule of N.C.G.S. § 1-52(16) applies to actions for criminal conversation, we reverse the Court of Appeals.
*621FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Donald Eugene Misc.heimer ■ (plaintiff) and his wife, Rebecca Misc.heimer (Mrs. Misc.heimer) were married in February 1971. Plaintiff met James Clayton Burris (defendant) in the 1970s. Defendant…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Black v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Diaz v. Division of Social ServicesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Kent Stahle v. CTS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- Birtha v. Stonemor, North Carolina, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- In re Camp Lejeune North Carolina Water Contamination LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016
- McClean v. Duke Univ.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2019
- Perry v. Pamlico CountyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.