Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mango

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 11, 1930No. Appeals 400, 401, 402, 403, 404 and 405PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, P. J.,

The appellants were indicted jointly in two indictments, the charges being involuntary manslaughter and the unlawful manufacture and possession of intoxicating liquor. The facts briefly summarized are:

On February 16, 1930, two men lost their lives in an explosion which occurred on certain premises in the city of Reading. Buried amidst the wreckage, the police found a large still fitted out with the apparatus necessary for distillation, a number of drums, some filled and some empty, several containing caustic soda, a number of cans and four acetylene tanks. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  2. Johnston v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  3. Commonwealth v. Liberty Products Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Commonwealth v. LloydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  5. Commonwealth v. SalerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Commonwealth v. AurickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Commonwealth v. SamsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Commonwealth v. RomigBerks County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API