Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Plumstead Twp. Zoning Hearing Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 27, 2007No. 126 MAP 2006PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BALDWIN.

Appellant A. Rhoades Wilson (Wilson) appeals from the Commonwealth Court decision denying his application for a variance to use his property solely for an accounting office, and not operate the business as an accessory to a principal use as a residence. We affirm the decision of the Commonwealth Court.

Wilson owns a parcel of land, tax parcel number 34-34-12, that is approximately 2.54 acres and is located on U.S. Route 611 in an R-2 Residential Zoning District in Plumstead Township, Bucks County. In 2003, Wilson purchased the subject property aware of the R-2 zoning. 1…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Girsh AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. City of Pittsburgh v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Taliaferro v. Darby Tp. Zoning Hearing Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. JudgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Marshall v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Ario v. Ingram Micro, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Lamar Advantage GP Co. v. Zoning Hearing Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Singer v. PHILA. ZONING BD. OF ADJUSTMENTCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Hammons, P. v. Ethicon, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API