Legal Opinion

Boyar-Schultz Corp. v. Tomasek

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 16, 1981No. 80-2855PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE GOLDBERG

delivered the opinion of the court:

Boyar-Schultz Corporation (plaintiff) brought action against Francis E. Tomasek and F.E.T. and Associates, Inc. (defendants) seeking injunctive enforcement of a restrictive covenant. At the close of plaintiff’s case, the trial court refused to grant a preliminary injunction and denied plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration and modification of this decision. Plaintiff appeals.

In February 1978, plaintiff purchased U.M.I. Corporation (U.M.I.), a business half-owned and operated by defendant Tomasek. U.M.I. manufactured and serviced…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. House of Vision, Inc. v. HiyaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Wessel Co. v. BusaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. Donald McElroy, Inc. v. DelaneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Image Supplies, Inc. v. HilmertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Tarr v. StearmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hamer Holding Group, Inc. v. ElmoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  2. Rao v. RaoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Russell v. Jim Russell Supply, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. Stamatakis Industries, Inc. v. KingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Hamer Holding Group, Inc. v. ElmoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API