Boyar-Schultz Corp. v. Tomasek
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE GOLDBERG
delivered the opinion of the court:
Boyar-Schultz Corporation (plaintiff) brought action against Francis E. Tomasek and F.E.T. and Associates, Inc. (defendants) seeking injunctive enforcement of a restrictive covenant. At the close of plaintiff’s case, the trial court refused to grant a preliminary injunction and denied plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration and modification of this decision. Plaintiff appeals.
In February 1978, plaintiff purchased U.M.I. Corporation (U.M.I.), a business half-owned and operated by defendant Tomasek. U.M.I. manufactured and serviced…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- House of Vision, Inc. v. HiyaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Wessel Co. v. BusaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Donald McElroy, Inc. v. DelaneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Image Supplies, Inc. v. HilmertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Tarr v. StearmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hamer Holding Group, Inc. v. ElmoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- Rao v. RaoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Russell v. Jim Russell Supply, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- Stamatakis Industries, Inc. v. KingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Hamer Holding Group, Inc. v. ElmoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.