Hamer Holding Group, Inc. v. Elmore
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scariano
Plaintiff appeals, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 307(a)(1) (134 Ill. 2d R. 307(a)(1)), from the circuit court’s denial of a preliminary injunction after remandment of the cause by this court in a previous appeal. (Hamer Holding Group, Inc. v. Elmore (1990), 202 Ill. App. 3d 994, 560 N.E.2d 907 (hereinafter Hamer I).) In Hamer I, we remanded the action for a determination of the scope of plaintiff’s business at the time defendant left its employ and whether, based on that finding, defendant’s covenant not to compete, the enforceability of which was the core issue in Hamer I, as it is here,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- House of Vision, Inc. v. HiyaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Bauer v. SawyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
- Corroon & Black of Illinois, Inc. v. MagnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- ABC Trans National Transport, Inc. v. Aeronautics Forwarders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Hamer Holding Group, Inc. v. ElmoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Robidoux v. OliphantIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Eichmann v. National Hospital & Health Care Services, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Jackson v. HammerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Health Professionals, Ltd. v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- The Agency, Inc. v. GroveAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.