Legal Opinion
Richter v. Van Amberg
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided April 12, 2000No. CIV 97-0751 PK/DJSPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge, Sitting by Designation.
THIS MATTER came on for consideration of Defendants’ oral motion to dismiss, really a motion for judgment as a matter of law, at the close of Plaintiffs case in chief. The court, having heard the evidence and considered the applicable law, found that the motion was well taken and should be granted. This memorandum opinion and order supplements the record.
Background
A. The Claims
Plaintiff Richter’s First Amended Complaint contains four claims against Defendant Ronald Van Amberg and the law firm he was associated…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Weisgram v. Marley Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Rice v. StrunkIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Alleco Inc. v. Harry & Jeanette Weinberg Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Teresita Pack v. Kmart Corporation, a Michigan Corporation Steve Nicholas, an Individual, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Marchman v. NCNB Texas National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Aller v. LLaw Office of Carole C. Schriefer, PCColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- City of Kalamazoo v. Michigan Disposal Service Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2000
- Spencer v. Paul Barber, Barber & Borg, L.L.C.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
- Murphy v. GormanDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
- Thi of New Mexico at Valle Norte, LLC v. HarveyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.