Legal Opinion
Kirk v. Heppt
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 9, 2008No. 05 CIV. 9977(RWS)PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant, pro se, Joseph M. Heppt (“Heppt” or the “Defendant”) has moved, presumably under Rule 12(b)(6), Fed. R.Civ.P., to dismiss the four causes of action set forth in the complaint of plaintiffs, pro se, Daniel Kirk (“Daniel”) and Linda Kirk (collectively, the “Kirks” or the “Plaintiffs”). The Kirks have cross-moved to dismiss the counterclaim of Heppt alleging breach of contract, account stated, and defamation.
For the reasons set forth below, the causes of action for mail fraud, violation of N.Y. Penal Code § 190.60, and violation of N.Y. General Business…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Air Atlanta Aero Engineering Ltd. v. SP Aircraft Owner I, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Pietrangelo v. Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, LLPDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Prout v. VladeckDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Kramer v. LOCKWOOD PENSION SERVICES, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Sheehy v. New Century Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.