Legal Opinion

Lindstrom v. Spicher

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNuesslb, J.

This appeal is from a judgment of the district court of Ward county, denying injunctive relief.

One Oouch, in 1924, was the owner and in possession, of a stock of merchandise, — drugs and druggists’ sundries, and fixtures in Ward county. He had conducted this business there for several years. He was financially involved and negotiated a sale of the merchandise and fixtures to the plaintiff, Mrs. A. O. Lindstrom, who took possession thereof. At the time of the sale, Couch owed personal property taxes assessed against the property sold, for the years 1921, 1922 and 1923, aggregating, several…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McKinster v. SagerIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People's Savings Bank v. Van AllsburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Fitz Henry v. MunterWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Sonnesyn v. AkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Hartwig v. RushingOregon Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. SchlossbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Douglas Aircraft Co. v. ByramCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. In Re Mercury Engineering, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1946
  4. Benefield v. McDonough Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. Noltze Motor Co. v. Burrows-Moore Pontiac, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API