Legal Opinion

United States v. Miller

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided August 28, 2006No. 2:06-cr-00004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HODGES, District Judge.

On July 6, 2006, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report (Doc. 60) recommending that the Defendant’s Motions to Suppress Evidence (Docs. 22, 23, 24) be denied. The Defendant has filed objections (Doc. 63) to the report, however, the Government has not filed any responses to the objections, and the time for responding has elapsed.

Upon an independent, de novo examination of the file and upon due consideration, it is adjudged that:(1) The Defendant’s objections (Doc. 63) are OVERRULED. The Defendant has not raised any new issues or law or fact that the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GarbaccioCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. United States v. CostelloDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  3. United States v. RichardsonDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API