United States v. Polomski
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Concurrence
WATKINS, Judge, with whom Senior Judge McKAY and Judge WERNER
join, concurring in the result:
I agree in principle with the majority holding that, in a judge-alone, guilty-plea general court-martial case it is error for the military judge to impose a fine in addition to forfeiture of all pay and allowances where he has failed during the providence inquiry to advise the accused that a fine constitutes an authorized element of punishment. I would make clear, however, that an error of this nature must be tested for prejudice and that the remedy of sentence modification is neither required nor…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. WallsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. PassiniUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. HintonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. GriegoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. ShirleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.