Howard v. Fraser
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stark
In this case the plaintiff sought, by two causes of action set out .in his complaint, to recover judgment against the defendant upon two promissory notes for the sum of $300 each, given by defendant to one A. Howard on May 3, 1926, due, respectively, 9 and 12 months after date, alleged to have been “sold, assigned, and transferred” to him by said A. Howard.
The defendant’s answer to each cause of action is the same. The making of the notes is admitted; but it is denied that they were made or executed for value, or that they were owned by plaintiff. The answer also sets forth three special…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harris v. BarnhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Foster v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Renshaw v. SwitzerMontana Supreme Court · 1887
- Budd v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jones v. Northwestern Auto Supply Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1932
- WASHINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. MeeksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- State v. EntzeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. YoungMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- Minnesota Loan & Trust Co. v. BusbyMontana Supreme Court · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.