Legal Opinion

M.G. v. Crisfield

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 5, 2008No. Civil Action 06-CV-5099(FLW)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOLFSON, District Judge.

Presently before the Court are the motions of Warren Township Board of Education (the “Board”), James A. Crisfield, Laura Weitzman, Joseph Palumbo, and Pamela Coley (collectively “Defendants”) to dismiss the federal and state law claims brought by M.G. and L.G., individually and on behalf of their child, A.G. (collectively “Plaintiffs”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. In the alternative, Defendants move to dismiss certain federal claims for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Specifically, Plaintiffs bring Section 1983 claims…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Centennial School District v. Phil L. Ex Rel. Matthew L.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. ARCHIE v. MERCER COUNTY COURTHOUSEDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
  3. DEVLIEGER v. CITY OF WARREN PENNSYLVANIADistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  4. K.J. v. GREATER EGG HARBOR REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
  5. KOUTZIS v. MELLEBYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API