Legal Opinion
Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Paddock Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 1, 2010No. 09 Civ. 1905(LBS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAND, District Judge.
In this patent infringement action, Plaintiff Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (now Teva Women’s Health, Inc.) (“Duramed”) brings a motion for partial summary judgment, and Defendant Paddock Laboratories, Inc. (“Paddock”) brings a motion for summary judgment of non-infringement. Duramed holds a patent that it contends covers its product Cenestin, a conjugated estrogen tablet used in hormone replacement therapy. Duramed contends that Paddock infringed its patent when Paddock sought to manufacture and market a generic version of Cenestin. In order to succeed on its…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Heublein, Inc. And Subsidiaries v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Paddock Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. Axion Biosystems, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2025
- Apnea Sciences Corporation v. Fissiontech LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026