Legal Opinion

Grochocinski v. Spehar Capital, LLC (In Re CMGT, Inc.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 12, 2008No. 19-02689PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN H. SQUIRES, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the motion of Spehar Capital, LLC (“Spe-har”) for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), made applicable by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7012(c). For the reasons set forth herein, the Court denies the motion because there are disputed issues of material fact and Spehar has not shown that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

I. JURISDICTION AND PROCEDURE

The Court has jurisdiction to entertain this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334 and Internal…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Northern Indiana Gun & Outdoor Shows, Inc. v. City of South Bend, Stephen Leucke, Brian R. Hedman, and Karl KingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. Zedner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Kelco Metals, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  2. Colemichael Investments, L.L.C. v. Burke (In Re Burke)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  3. In Re Cmgt, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  4. Raymond Professional Group, Inc. v. William A. Pope Co. (In Re Raymond Professional Group, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
  5. Grochocinski v. Spehar Capital, LLC (In Re CMGT, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API