Legal Opinion
New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Humphrey
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 19, 1931No. 5867PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, District Judge.
Appellee, plaintiff below, conceiving herself aggrieved by the awsrrd of the Industrial Accident Board of the State of Texas, filed her suit under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law of that state (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. Tex., arts. 8306-8309) to recover compensation for the death of her husband, which occurred, as she alleged, “while in the discharge of his duties as an employee of the Kosack Construction Company, and while actually engaged in mixing mortar for the said construction company on one of its jobs in Dallas, Texas, and while working in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bryant v. Continental Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1916
- Townsend & Freeman Co. v. TaggartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
- Hebert v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Texas Employers' Ins. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- O'Pry v. Security Union Casualty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1928
3Cited by6 opinions
- American General Ins. Co. v. WebsterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Casualty Underwriters v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. WimberlyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- City of Austin v. CookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Federal Underwriters Exchange v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.