Legal Opinion

Hebert v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided January 18, 1928No. 1025-4948PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.

A judgment for compensation as for death “resulting from injury” (section 8, art. 8306, R. S. 1925) was reversed and judgment rendered for the insurer by the honorable Court of Civil Appeals, Ninth District, 296 S. W. 688. The case is properly and fully stated in that opinion. The matters assigned are discussed below.

Compensable death must have for its foundation “injury” (section 8, art. 8306) of the nature of “damage or harm to the physical structure of the body” (article 8309, R. S. 1925), and of origin in causative danger in the employment (article 8309), Lumberman’s Reciprocal Ass’n v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Lumberman's Reciprocal Ass'n. v. BehnkenTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Bryant v. Continental Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Hopkins v. Michigan Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Federal Rubber Manufacturing Co. v. HavolicWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. American General Ins. Co. v. WebsterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Commercial Standard Insurance Company v. AllredTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. WarnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Evans v. Continental Life and Accident CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API