Legal Opinion

Halliday v. Barr

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 11, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2020-3444Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROBERT B. HALLIDAY III, et al., Petitioners, v. Case No. 20-cv-3444 (CRC) MONTY WILKINSON, in his official capacity as Acting Attorney General of the United States, et al., Respondents. MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioners Robert B. Halliday III and Patricia M. Halliday filed this petition for a writ of mandamus to compel a federal investigation into the disappearance of their son, Private Richard K. Halliday of the U.S. Army. The Court concludes that this case must be dismissed because it is clear on the face of the petition that the Court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Tony Best v. Sharon Pratt Kelly, MayorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  3. Rolando Otero v. United States Attorney General, State of Florida, Richard GersteinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  4. Lemon v. KramerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  5. Whittle v. MoschellaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API