Legal Opinion

Rolando Otero v. United States Attorney General, State of Florida, Richard Gerstein

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided November 13, 1987No. 87-5291PublishedCited by 127 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Rolando Otero filed a complaint seeking the issuance of a writ of mandamus to compel defendants to investigate and prosecute a former Florida State Attorney. The district court properly dismissed the complaint with prejudice for two reasons.

First, a private citizen has no judicially cognizable interest in the prosecution or non-prosecution of another. Linda R.S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 619, 93 S.Ct. 1146, 1149, 35 L.Ed.2d 536 (1973).

Second, prosecutorial discretion may not be controlled by a writ of mandamus. Powell v. Katzenbach, 359 F.2d 234 (D.C.Cir.1965), cer t. denied, 384 U.S. 906,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Linda RS v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Diana Kearny Powell v. Nicholas Katzenbach, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966

3Cited by127 opinions

  1. Doe v. University of AlabamaDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2016
  2. Abrahim Fata v. Charles Lang, et al.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
  3. Abrahim Fata v. Edwin Arcelly, et al.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
  4. Allah v. RamosDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2019
  5. Allen J. Harris v. Warden Shawn Gillis and Kylie KinnettDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2026

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API