Rolando Otero v. United States Attorney General, State of Florida, Richard Gerstein
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Per curiam
Rolando Otero filed a complaint seeking the issuance of a writ of mandamus to compel defendants to investigate and prosecute a former Florida State Attorney. The district court properly dismissed the complaint with prejudice for two reasons.
First, a private citizen has no judicially cognizable interest in the prosecution or non-prosecution of another. Linda R.S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 619, 93 S.Ct. 1146, 1149, 35 L.Ed.2d 536 (1973).
Second, prosecutorial discretion may not be controlled by a writ of mandamus. Powell v. Katzenbach, 359 F.2d 234 (D.C.Cir.1965), cer t. denied, 384 U.S. 906,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Linda RS v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Diana Kearny Powell v. Nicholas Katzenbach, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
3Cited by127 opinions
- Doe v. University of AlabamaDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2016
- Abrahim Fata v. Charles Lang, et al.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- Abrahim Fata v. Edwin Arcelly, et al.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- Allah v. RamosDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2019
- Allen J. Harris v. Warden Shawn Gillis and Kylie KinnettDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2026
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.