Legal Opinion

Perschbacher v. Moseley

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1965No. 7536PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOBLE, justice.

A copy of 'an instrument purporting to be the last will of Katie Perschbacher, deceased, was admitted to probate over the protest' of'Mary E. Moseley, mother and sole' heir at law of the decedent. The original instrument was alleged to have been lost or mislaid after decedent’s death. On appeal to the district court, the issues were tried to a jury and resulted in a verdict finding that Katie Perschbacher died testate leaving a valid and unrevoked will. A motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was denied and this appeal followed.

The protestant relies heavily upon the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. International Traveler's Ass'n v. BettisTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Hepp v. Quickel Auto & Supply Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Adams v. TatschNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Nemo v. Local Joint Executive Board & Hotel & Restaurant Employees' Local No. 556Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  5. Padilla v. WinsorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Gray v. EJ Longyear CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Gruschus v. CR Davis Contracting CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Barnes v. Sadler Associates, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Boddy v. BoddyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Matter of Estate of KerrNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API