Legal Opinion

Horn v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 16, 1925No. A-4363PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

For brevity and convenience the plaintiff in error will be referred to as defendant, as in the court below. The defendant was convicted in the district court of Craig county for the crime of uttering a forged instrument, the release of a mortgage, and sentenced to a term of seven years in the penitentiary. The following assignments of error are argued in the brief: First. That the information is defective. Second. Refusal of requested instructions. Third. Failure of the court to properly instruct on circumstantial evidence. Fourth. Insufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction. These…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Star v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Hendrix v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Matthews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Raybourn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1958
  2. Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Chappell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Hawkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API