Legal Opinion

Matthews v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 22, 1913No. A-1304PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Logan County; A. H. Huston, Judge. Willie Matthews and another were convicted of grand larceny and their punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for five years, and defendant Willie Matthews appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFurman, J.

This is a case depending entirely upon cit-chmstantial evidence. The court did not givé an instruction with reference to circumstantial evidence, neither was such an instruction requested by counsel for appellant. Wé think that an instruction upon circumstantial evidence should have been given. But as no exception was reserved to the action of the trial court in failing to give such an instruction, we cannot reverse the conviction upon this ground. But upon an examination of the en tire testimony we are not satisfied that the circumstances proven are of such a conclusive character as to…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. De Bose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Lair v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. Smiser v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Hess v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API