Legal Opinion

Bigbie v. Bigbie

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 5, 1995No. 80589PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Justice:

Charles Roy Bigbie, III (Husband), appeals the judgment of the district court granting a divorce to both Husband and Betty Louise Bigbie (Wife), and distributing marital assets. Husband claims the trial court erred in considering “future acquired property” in the form of future commissions on renewals of insurance policies in its determination of the marital assets and erred in placing restrictions upon Husband’s custodianship of a portion of their children’s property, namely insurance policies.

The Court of Appeals held the trial court did not err in treating the future…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hall v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. In Re Marriage of SkadenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. James v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  4. Niroo v. NirooCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Ettinger v. EttingerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Parker v. Western Dakota Insurors, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Lippitt v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009
  3. Marriage of Finkenstaedt v. FinkenstaedtCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
  4. Bigbie v. BigbieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Parker v. Western Dakota Insurors, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API