Legal Opinion
Bigbie v. Bigbie
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 5, 1995No. 80589Published
1Opinion of the Court
898 P.2d 1271 (1995)
Betty Louise BIGBIE, Appellee,
v.
Charles Roy BIGBIE, III, Appellant.
No. 80589.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
July 5, 1995.
Carl A. Barnes, Tulsa, for appellee.
Lawrence A.G. Johnson, Tulsa, for appellant.
SIMMS, Justice:
Charles Roy Bigbie, III (Husband), appeals the judgment of the district court granting a divorce to both Husband and Betty Louise Bigbie (Wife), and distributing marital assets. Husband claims the trial court erred in considering "future acquired property" in the form of future commissions on renewals of insurance policies in its determination of the marital assets…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hall v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- In Re Marriage of SkadenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- James v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Niroo v. NirooCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Ettinger v. EttingerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.