Legal Opinion

United States v. Adell

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 15, 1996No. 95-CO-388PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

After appellee Adell was stopped by the police for a traffic violation, a police officer recovered a quantity of cocaine inside a plastic bag which the officer removed from Adell’s pocket. The trial court ruled that the officer had violated Adell’s Fourth Amendment rights when he reached into the pocket and granted a motion to suppress the cocaine. We affirm, but on a ground different from that relied upon by the trial court.

I

At about 6:00 p.m. on June 14, 1994, two police officers stopped Adell’s car on Florida Avenue, N.W., because it lacked a front license plate and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Moore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Murphy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ball v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Pinkney v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Dickerson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Millet v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API