Legal Opinion

Millet v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 13, 2009No. 08-CM-411PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Senior Judge:

Appellant entered a conditional plea of guilty to a charge of possession of marijuana. His arrest and conviction arose from the stop and search of a car in which he was a passenger. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his pre-plea motion to suppress the marijuana which the police recovered when they searched him because the search preceded his arrest, and also because the search exceeded the scope of a lawful frisk under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). In addition, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence that he possessed…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. UNITED STATES v. DAVID D. LEWISDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Thomas M. Butler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. United States v. William A. Nash, Jr. and David LewisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Drake v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API