Legal Opinion
Michelle Richards v. Ernst & Young, LLP
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 9, 2013No. 18-55982PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION PER CURIAM:
ORDER
The opinion filed on August 21, 2013, is hereby amended for the purposes of clarification. A copy of the amended opinion will be filed concurrently with this order. As the amendments are not substantive, the Plaintiff-Appellee’s Petition for Panel Rehearing and/or Rehearing En Banc is not affected and remains pending before the court.
OPINION
Defendant Ernst & Young, LLP appeals the district court’s denial of its motion to compel arbitration of state wage and hour claims asserted by its former employee, Michelle Richards. 1 The defendant filed the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Compucredit Corp. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Peterson v. Highland Music, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Fisher v. A.G. Becker Paribas Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Saint Agnes Medical Center v. PacifiCare of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Paige Martin v. Gary YasudaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- The Depot, Inc. v. Caring for Montanans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Teresa Armstrong v. Michaels Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Jacob Lewis v. Epic Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Murphy Oil USA, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.