Legal Opinion

Tate v. USA

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided March 10, 2022No. 6:21-cv-00105Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION at LONDON DARRELL L. TATE, Petitioner, Civil Action No. 6: 21-105-KKC V. USA, et al., MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Respondents. *** *** *** *** Proceeding without an attorney, Petitioner Darrell L. Tate has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. [R. 8].1 By prior Order, the Court granted Tate’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and waived payment of the $5.00 filing fee. [R. 11] Thus, this matter is before the Court to conduct the initial screening required by 28 U.S.C. § 2243.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Eric Martin v. William OvertonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. Reed v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Erwin v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API