Legal Opinion
State v. Cosby
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 16, 2007No. AC 25770PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
The defendant, Howard W. Cosby, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a) (l). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) instructed the jury on consciousness of guilt, (2) allowed certain constancy of accusation testimony and (3) denied his motion for a judgment of acquittal because the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction of sexual assault in the first degree. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. TroupeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. LusterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. PowellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. BlangoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. RickettsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Romero v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. BarnesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. CosbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.