Legal Opinion

Featherston v. District of Columbia Superior Court

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 17, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2007-1933PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Apryl N. Featherston, a former employee of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, claims that after being diagnosed with bilateral carpel tunnel syndrome, defendant the District of Columbia discriminated against her in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (“ADA”) (Count I) and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 791 et seq. (Count II); failed to provide, or to timely respond to claims for, workers’ compensation to which she is entitled (Count III); and discharged her in…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Owens-Hart v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  2. Woytowicz v. George Wash. Univ.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. Minter v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  4. Featherston v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
  5. (Leave of Court is Needed for Plaintiff) Chandler v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API