Hilliard v. Shellabarger
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore
The parties to this litigation are before us in the same order as they appeared in the trial court and will be hereinafter designated as plaintiff and defendants.
Plaintiff, as conservator of the estate of Agnes Rumery, brought this action to set aside a deed conveying real estate belonging to Rumery to the defendants. Generally, plaintiff alleged that the grantees in said deed paid a grossly inadequate consideration for said conveyance; that the grantor lacked the mental capacity to execute the deed; and that the same was secured from her by the exercise of undue influence by the grantees…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stahl v. StahlIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Cardenas v. OrtizNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Verner v. MoselySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Dittbrenner v. MyersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
- Sears v. HicklinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Krueger v. ArySupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
- Judkins v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- First National Bank of Denver v. GroussmanColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
- White v. WhiteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
- Zink v. CarlileSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.