Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. Murphy

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1885No. 11,940PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

In this case the appellee, Murphy, presented to and filed Avith the appellant, at its June term, 1883, his claim or complaint, Avherein he alleged that theretofore, on the ■ — ■ day of-, 1878, the then auditor of Henry county, by order of the appellant, made an additional assessment of the rights^ credits and property of the appellee, and placed the same on the tax-duplicate of such county for the year 1878, as folloAvs, to Avit:

For 1872, on $4,000 personalty, a tax of. . . $60 72

For 1873, “ ■ 4,000 “ “ ... 59 13

For 1874, « 5,000 “ “ ... 61 49

For 1875, “ 5,000 “ “ ... '55 44

For 1876, « 2,000…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. ArmStrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Board of Commissioners v. RitterIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Durham v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Stockman v. RobbinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Wright v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stout v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Board of Commissioners v. AdlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. City of Indianapolis v. VajenIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Board of Commissioners v. SennIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Donch v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API