Legal Opinion

United States v. Malicia Lyn Taylor Osborne

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 13, 2005No. 02-6526PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-appellant Malicia Lyn Taylor Osborne (“Mrs. Osborne”) pleaded guilty in United States District Court to various drug-related offenses. Mrs. Osborne was represented in district court by defense counsel Steven Thornton (“Thornton”). Thornton also represented her codefen-dant husband James Osborne (“Mr. Osborne”). On appeal, Mrs. Osborne asserts that this dual representation created a constitutionally impermissible conflict of interest. Specifically, Mrs. Osborne contends her Sixth Amendment right to conflict-free counsel was violated and that because of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Mickens v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. United States v. Darnell L. Walker (96-3073) William A. McKinley (96-3938)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Charles H. Straughter, Genell Brown, Ladonna ThorntonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Silvia J. Thomas v. Chancey Miller and Elmwood CemeteryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Days Inns Worldwide, Inc. v. Bharat Patel, Alibaba Charchor, Inc. And Mukesh PatelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Ronnie Joe DixonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. Mitchell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API