United States v. Malicia Lyn Taylor Osborne
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant Malicia Lyn Taylor Osborne (“Mrs. Osborne”) pleaded guilty in United States District Court to various drug-related offenses. Mrs. Osborne was represented in district court by defense counsel Steven Thornton (“Thornton”). Thornton also represented her codefen-dant husband James Osborne (“Mr. Osborne”). On appeal, Mrs. Osborne asserts that this dual representation created a constitutionally impermissible conflict of interest. Specifically, Mrs. Osborne contends her Sixth Amendment right to conflict-free counsel was violated and that because of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mickens v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Darnell L. Walker (96-3073) William A. McKinley (96-3938)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Charles H. Straughter, Genell Brown, Ladonna ThorntonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Silvia J. Thomas v. Chancey Miller and Elmwood CemeteryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Days Inns Worldwide, Inc. v. Bharat Patel, Alibaba Charchor, Inc. And Mukesh PatelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Ronnie Joe DixonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Mitchell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.