Legal Opinion
United States v. Darnell L. Walker (96-3073) William A. McKinley (96-3938)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 19, 1998No. 96-3073, 96-3938PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYAN, Circuit Judge.
The defendants, Darnell L. Walker and William A. McKinley, appeal from the judgments of conviction and sentences imposed following a jury trial on various drug and firearm charges in connection with a conspiracy to distribute cocaine and cocaine base in Youngstown, Ohio. The appeals present numerous issues, none of which warrant setting aside the defendant’s convictions. We will, therefore, affirm both defendants’ convictions, and Walker’s sentence. We conclude, however, that McKinley’s sentence must be vacated because the district court clearly erred in finding that…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- United States v. David Devon DavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. JerossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Tony SparkmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. LawCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Rodney Mack, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.