Legal Opinion
People v. Justin K.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 22, 2002No. G027492PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEDSWORTH, J.
Following the denial of his motion to suppress, Justin K. admitted driving under the influence of alcohol. He contends his due process rights were violated because the prosecution did not file written opposition to his motion. He also contends his motion had merit. We disagree with both contentions and affirm the judgment.
On the evening of March 18, 2000, Tustin Police Officer Mark Sauerwein noticed Justin driving a 1988 Buick Regal. Although the two brake lights above the bumper of the car were working, the third brake light located in the rear window was not. Because of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States of America,plaintiff-Appellee v. Armando Lopez-SotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Arkansas v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. Richard Eugene MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Sud v. Costco Wholesale Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- People v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. CarmonaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.