Legal Opinion

People v. Ramirez

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 2006No. B182791PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL, J.

Oscar Ramirez was charged with carrying a concealed firearm (count 1) and carrying a loaded and unregistered firearm (count 2), with allegations that the offenses were committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang. (Pen. Code, §§ 12025, subd. (a)(2), 12031, subd. (a)(1), 186.22, subd. (b)(1)(A).) Ramirez moved unsuccessfully to suppress evidence (the firearm), and he then entered a no contest plea to count 1 and admitted the gang enhancement. Count 2 was dismissed and probation was granted. Ramirez appeals, claiming the officer lacked probable cause to stop him and that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. DeVaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. United States v. Joe Davis TwilleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Wilson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HubbleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. AnayaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. WrightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Gilmore v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. State v. Antonio D. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API