Legal Opinion

Synco, Inc. v. Headen

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 3, 1980No. 7926SC802PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

This appeal raises two questions: did the trial court err (1) in ordering the compulsory reference, and (2) in dismissing plaintiffs’ actions for failure to offer at trial a transcript of the evidence heard by the Referee?

*112The written warranties, which are the subject of the actions before us, relate to the plans and specifications for the apartment complexes including certain appliances and equipment in each unit.

The reason for the mistrial and reference are stated in the two opening paragraphs of the order of reference as follows:

“After three and a half days of trial before the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shute v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Rudisill v. HoyleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Pack v. . KatzinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. American Trust Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Dayton Rubber Manufacturing Co. v. HornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mitchell, Brewer, Richardson, Adams, Burge & Boughman v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API