Synco, Inc. v. Headen
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
This appeal raises two questions: did the trial court err (1) in ordering the compulsory reference, and (2) in dismissing plaintiffs’ actions for failure to offer at trial a transcript of the evidence heard by the Referee?
*112The written warranties, which are the subject of the actions before us, relate to the plans and specifications for the apartment complexes including certain appliances and equipment in each unit.
The reason for the mistrial and reference are stated in the two opening paragraphs of the order of reference as follows:
“After three and a half days of trial before the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Shute v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Rudisill v. HoyleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Pack v. . KatzinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- American Trust Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Dayton Rubber Manufacturing Co. v. HornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mitchell, Brewer, Richardson, Adams, Burge & Boughman v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017