Turney v. Morrissey
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco directing a Writ of Mandamus to issue against appellants. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This is an appeal by defendants from an order directing that a peremptory writ of mandate issue, commanding defendants, as the trustees of the Anvil Land and Stock Company, a defunct corporation that had forfeited its franchise as a corporation for failure to pay its license fee (Kaiser Land & Fruit Co. v. Curry, 155 Cal. 638, [103 Pac. 341]), to execute a deed to plaintiff, as the owner of all the issued stock of the corporation, of a certain piece of land, comprising all of the assets of the corporation.
The record discloses without dispute that the forfeiture of the charter resulted through…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kaiser Land and Fruit Co. v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hutchison v. Reclamation District No. 1619California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Bruun v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Wiseman v. Sierra Highland Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Middlecoff v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1934
- Oliver v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.