Legal Opinion

Mountcastle v. Schumann

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 1964No. Appeal, 150PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Flood, J.,

The defendant constable, authorized by the defendant landlords to distrain upon the personal property of the plaintiffs for rent in arrears, went to the apartment house in which they occupied a second floor apartment. Mr. Mountcastle, the husband plaintiff, met the constable on the stairway. The constable handed him the notice of distraint but did not enter the premises, view the goods or take physical possession of them. The tenants filed a writ of replevin with bond against the constable and the landlords to recover the goods. At the trial the plaintiffs obtained a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Derbyshire Bros. v. McManamySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Furbush v. ChappellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  3. Potts Dept. Store v. Lutz SweigartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Greenberg v. Goldman Stores Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Ewald v. Fidelity Title & Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gross v. FoxDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Mountcastle v. Schumann, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API