Legal Opinion

City of Richland v. Null

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1916PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Pulaski County. — Hon. L. B. Woodside, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRobertson, P. J.

A verified complaint was filed with the mayor of plaintiff city by a private citizen charging defendant with violating a city ordinance. A warrant was issued, defendant was arrested and upon a trial he was convicted.- He appealed to the circuit court and there filed a motion to dismiss. The motion was sustained and the city has appealed. The propositions of law involved and the contentions in behalf of defendant are succinctly stated by his attorneys as follows:

*178“The City of Richland is a city of the fourth class and was incorporated under the statute of this State permitting the same and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kansas City v. NealSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. Keeney v. McVoySupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. Benton v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  4. City of King City v. DuncanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  5. City of St. Louis v. Christian Bros. CollegeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kramer v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. State v. TurleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. State Ex Rel. Crouser v. MercerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Hamel v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. City of Stoughton v. PowersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API