Legal Opinion

City of St. Louis v. Christian Bros. College

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 13, 1914PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Eon. C. C. Allen, Judge. (1) Tbe passage of the ordinance authorizing the city counselor to cause Kingshighway to he established as a boulevard, is not a condemnation of the property-described in the ordinance.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Eon. C. C. Allen, Judge. (1) Tbe passage of the ordinance authorizing the city counselor to cause Kingshighway to he established as a boulevard, is not a condemnation of the property-described in the ordinance. Mining Co. v. City of Joplin, 124 Mo. 138; City v. Hill, 116 Mo. 527; St. Louis v. Dorr, 145 Mo. 485; 3 Dillon on Municipal Corporations (5 Ed.), p. 1640, sec. 1036; 2 Lewis on Eminent Domain (3 Ed.), p. 911, sec. 505, and p. 913, sec. 506; Secs. 1 and 2, art. 6, Charter of St. Louis. (2) Whatever the English rule may be, the well established…

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Action to widen street. From a judgment for defendants plaintiff appeals.

In the city of St. Louis there has existed for many years a thoroughfare extending from Easton avenue to Penrose street, known as “Kingshighway Boulevard,” which is not a boulevard in fact, but a street. Said street probably traverses other parts of said city, but that fact is not pertinent to the issues before us.

*548On March 27, 1907, the legislative department of St. Lonis enacted, in due form, an ordinance having for. its purpose the making of a real boulevard out of said Kingshighway Boulevard. This ordinance will…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Forster v. . ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Verdin v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. Westerman v. Supreme Lodge Knights of PythiasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  4. Keeney v. McVoySupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. State ex inf. Folk v. TaltySupreme Court of Missouri · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brown v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. Stack v. General Baking Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  3. Bowers v. Missouri Mutual Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. Board of Registration Com'rs. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  5. Egan v. PalmerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API